This is part 1 of a multipart series of articles regarding offered anti-gambling legislation. In this article I discuss the offered legislation, what the people in politics say สล็อต it does, some details of the current state of online gaming, and what the bills really propose.
The legislators are attempting to protect us from something, or are they? The whole thing seems a little confusing to say the least.
The house, and the Senate, are once again considering the issue of “Online Gambling”. Bills have been submitted by Congressmen Goodlatte and Leach, and also by Senator Kyl.
The bill being put forward by Representative. Goodlatte has the stated objective of updating the Line Act to outlaw all forms of online gaming, to make it illegal for a gaming business to just accept credit and electronic transactions, and to force ISPs and Common Carriers to block access to gaming related sites at the request of law enforcement.
Just as does Representative. Goodlatte, Sen. Kyl, in his bill, Prohibition on Funding of Against the law Internet Gaming, makes it illegal for gaming businesses to just accept credit cards, electronic transactions, checks and other forms of payment, but his bill does not address the keeping of proposition wagers.
The bill submitted by Representative. Leach, The Against the law Internet Gaming Enforcement Act, is simply a copy of the bill submitted by Sen. Kyl. It focuses on preventing gaming businesses from accepting credit cards, electronic transactions, checks, and other payments, and like the Kyl bill makes no changes from what is currently legal.
According to Representative. Goodlatte “While gaming is currently illegal in the united states unless regulated by the states, the development of the Internet has made gaming easy to access. Extremely common for illegal gaming businesses to operate freely until law enforcement finds and stops them. inches
In fact, American courts have determined that the Line Act makes only Sports Gambling on illegal, and even then only across telephone lines. Very few states have laws that will make online gaming illegal, some states and Tribes have taken steps to legalize online gaming, and even the federal government appreciates some forms of online gaming as being legal.
Goodlatte himself says his bill “cracks down on illegal gaming by updating the Line Act to cover all forms of interstate gaming and be aware of new technologies. Under current federal law, it is unclear whether creating an online business to operate a gaming business is illegal”.
Goodlatte’s bill however does not “cover all forms of interstate gambling” as he claims, but instead carves out exemptions for several forms of online gaming such as state lotteries, proposition wagers on horse racing, and fantasy sports. Even then, his modifications to the Line Act do not make online gaming illegal, they make it illegal for a gaming business to just accept online proposition wagers where a person risks something of value “upon the of a match of others, a sporting event, or a game predominantly at the mercy of chance”, except of course if it is circumstances lottery, horse race, fantasy sports, or one of a number of situations.
The truth of the matter is that most online gaming businesses have located in other countries specifically to avoid the greyish area that is the current state of online gaming the united states. As a result, there is little that law enforcement can do to implement these laws. Trying to make the laws tougher, and providing for stiffer penalties, will not make them much easier to implement.
As well, most, if not all, banks and creditors refuse to transfer money to an online gaming business now, as a result of pressure from the federal government. As a result, alternative payment systems sprang up to fill the void.
Senator Kyl is equally confusing in his statements. From his offered bill, “Internet gaming is primarily funded through personal use of payment system instruments, credit cards, and line transactions. inches But as we already know, most credit cards in the U. S. reject attempts to fund a gaming account.
Also from the Kyl bill, “Internet gaming is a growing cause of commercial collection agency problems for insured depository institutions and the consumer credit industry. inches If the creditors and other financial institutions in the U. S are not allowing the funding of gaming, how can it be “a growing cause of commercial collection agency problems”. And since when do we’d like legislation in order for the financial industry to protect itself from riskly debt. If the financial industry was accepting gaming debts and these gaming charges were a problem for them, wouldn’t they just stop accepting them?
Like Representative. Gooddlatte, Representative. Leach and Senator Kyl carve out exemptions for gambling on on horse racing, for fantasy sports and for buying and selling securities. Unlike Representative. Goodlatte however, Representative. Leach and Sen. Kyl do not exempt state lotteries from their prohibition of online gaming.
Next article, I will begin to cover some of the issues raised by people in politics who are against online gaming, and provide a different perspective to their rhetoric.